Poe’s The Cask of Amontillado Summary and Analysis

Spread the love

Before going to into the Cask of Amontillado summary and analysis section of the blog, the readers are advised to read the overview section to get a better grip on the topic under discussion.


Published monthly out of Philadelphia, “The Cask of Amontillado” made its debut in the November 1846 issue of Godey’s Lady’s Book, which featured works by some of the most celebrated nineteenth-century American authors, including Nathaniel Hawthorne, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, and Harriet Beecher Stowe. The story was subsequently published in 1850 in Rufus W. Griswold’s edition of Poe’s Works.

Already famous for his poem “The Raven” (1844) and his collection of short stories titled Tales, Poe was already well-established as a literary talent by the time he penned this story. Critics thought these earlier pieces great and frightening, and their creator puzzling and unethical, sparking heated debate.

Even though “The Cask of Amontillado” didn’t get special notice from critics when it came out, it didn’t sway the attitudes of Poe’s contemporary supporters or adversaries any way. Like many of Poe’s other tales, this one has been in continuous publication since its initial publication in 1850.

Montresor, the story’s narrator, harbours a secret animosity towards Fortunato for reasons that are never fully revealed. Montresor lures a tipsy Fortunato through a maze of rooms in the basement of his palazzo with the promise of a sip of the Amontillado wine he has just purchased. The two men make it to the final basement chamber, where Montresor binds Fortunato to the wall, seals him in with a new wall, and leaves him to die.

Edward Bulwer-historical Lytton’s novel The Last Days of Pompeii (1843), a local Boston tale, a collection of Letters from Italy, and a real disagreement Poe had with two other poets are just a few of the sources that have been suggested for the plot during the past century and a half.

Read more: The Rape of the Lock: Summary and Analysis

Some of the composers and artists in the United States, Great Britain, and Europe who were influenced by Poe’s short stories include Claude Debussy, who was “haunted” by the atmosphere of Poe’s tales, and Aubrey Beardsley. Poe was condemned during his lifetime for investigating a murder with no clear reason and a killer who showed no remorse for his actions. Poe’s creation has drawn and turned off readers for over 150 years because of these same topics.

The Cask of Amontillado summary

The storyline is not very complicated. The first-person narrator, whose name we subsequently discover to be Montresor, makes an initial announcement that someone by the name of Fortunato has hurt him on multiple occasions and has insulted him most recently. In the tale, Montresor is shown as carrying out his vendetta against an unsatisfied Fortuna by manipulating Fortunato and using his power to exact retribution on him.

The fact that Montresor never told Fortunato about his animosity is of the utmost importance. During one evening of the festival, when there was a lot of celebration going on, Montresor has set up his insane and diabolical plot, and he is very certain that he will never be found out about it. Montresor, aware that Fortunato considered himself to be a great expert of fine wines and, in particular, a fanatic of a sherry known as Amontillado, complimented him by eagerly asking his opinion on a newly acquired cask of Amontillado before purchasing it.

Fortunato was especially passionate about the Amontillado sherry. He played a prank on Fortunato with the rare liquor, even going so far as to imply that the cellars in which he housed the wine were damp. Fortunato, on the other hand, was adamant about tasting the wine and demanded to be brought to Montresor’s house in order to do so. Montresor gave his assent while carefully concealing his identity by draping a cloak over his shoulders before giving his response.

Read more: Aristotle’s Poetics: A Philosophical Perspective

Fortunato walked unsteadily as they descended into the vaults, and the “bells upon his cap jingled” as they descended, providing a further carnival atmosphere or a merry time. This is a moment that will ironically end shortly with the unfortunate Fortunato’s living death.

Fortunato’s persistent coughing was brought on by the niter as they made their way deeper into the vaults, but he was hungover and eager to keep going. However, at one point during the conversation, Montresor stopped, and while he was doing so, he offered Fortunato a bottle of Medoc wine to help him combat the bitter cold and the noxious vapours of the niter.

This act, which may appear to be one of charity, is actually just a means of keeping the victim alive long enough to transport him to the niche where he will be buried alive. Following Fortunato’s consumption of the Medoc, he once more became animated, and his bells began to ring.

They raised a glass to each other and the happy life. When Fortunato remarked on how spacious the vaults were, Montresor informed him that he had overheard someone saying that the Montresor family was a powerful and numerous one. Then, while under the influence of alcohol, Fortunato declared that he had forgotten what the coat of arms of Montresor looked like.

At the period when the events of the narrative take place, this statement would be considered one of many flagrant insults that Fortunato has committed, which is why Montresor despises him. As the two men travelled deeper in the tunnels, Fortunato begged for another drink despite the growing discomfort caused by the niter fumes and the decreasing temperature. Fortunato drank the entire bottle of De Grave that had been given to him by Montresor.

We learn that there are many catacombs of long-deceased relatives as they continue their quest. Montresor took Fortunato into a tiny crypt that was about four feet deep, three feet broad, and six or seven feet tall in one of the catacombs. Fortunato was informed by Montresor that the Amontillado was present. As soon as Fortunato entered, he slammed against the stone wall, and Montresor instantly chained him to it.

The timing of the brilliant idea was perfect, and his planning was impeccable. Because it was carnival season, he planned to let the servants out at a time when no one would be suspicious; as a result, his entire revenge strategy was so expertly planned that Montresor had to be a particularly gifted individual. Fortunato was too inebriated to even notice what was happening, much less try to escape.

In conclusion, the first irony is that the victim’s name, Fortunato, is Italian for “the fortunate one.” Since Montresor appears to be addressing someone at various points in the text, the reader may perhaps at some point ponder who Montresor is and why he is speaking to that person.

Montresor must be extremely elderly now because the act was carried out more than fifty years ago and he was obviously not a young man at the time.

Read more: The Solitary Reaper By Wordsworth: Summary And Analysis

The murderer’s heinous efficiency, the fact that Montresor has lived without consequence, and the ironic fact that his victim has been at peace for fifty years all shock the reader.

On every plane, the dual and ironic perspective is maintained. When Montresor first saw Fortunato, he kept grinning at him. Fortunato thought the smile was one of kindness and warmth, but it was actually a devilish grin in preparation for Fortunato’s burial.

The Cask of Amontillado analysis

In The Cask of Amontillado, as in many of Poe’s tales, the dearth of evidence that supports Montresor’s claim to Fortunato’s “thousand injuries” and “insult” keeps the reader in a state of terror. The story emphasises retaliation and unsolved crimes as a strategy to avoid using legal procedures for justice. Law is not mentioned in any way on Montresor’s or Poe’s detecting cover, and the story’s enduring horror is the idea of a punishment without proof.

In this story, Montresor uses his unique talent for Fortunato’s offence to declare himself judge, board, and hangman, which also makes him an erratic storyteller. Montresor claims this story occurred 50 years ago; this significant gap in time between the instances and the events’ descriptions makes the story all the more misleading.

The unreliability of Montresor diverts the evidence’s reasonable focus, even notable insulting incidents that, in a world without Poe, would undoubtedly come before any fatal conclusion. The Cask of Amontillado takes this problem—that several persons view the same events differently—to its horrific conclusion on an individual level.

Read more: William Blake: A Modern Poet Ahead of His Time

To probe Montresor’s motivations, Poe relies heavily on the symbolism of colour. With a black silk scarf across his face, Montresor not only represents unfair revenge but also the Gothic opposite of blocked justice. Fortunato, on the other hand, dresses like a court fool, donning the garb of a variety of colours, and he correctly identifies Montresor’s disguised things despite being fatally duped by them.

The irony of Fortunato’s death sentence is depicted here through the use of colour. Fortunato, which translates to “the lucky one” in English, must accept the fact that life is often cruel, especially during times celebrated as festivals. Montresor justifies their lack of decorum by referring to the exhibition’s setting.

The carnival is a symbol of good-natured social interaction, but Montresor twists that meaning around to suit his own purposes. The story’s descent into the underworld is hinted at by the many allusions to Montresor’s family’s skeletons that decorate the graves. The parallels between the two men’s underground journeys to the crisis are striking. Because Montresor’s plans for the exposition in the land of the living have fallen through, he has resorted to bringing the carnival down to the realm of the dead and the occult.

Poe frequently uses foreshadowing as a tool to heighten the story’s tension and unpredictability. Montresor, for instance, responds “True” to Fortunato’s claim that “I shall not die of a cough” since he knows that Fortunato will actually die of thirst and hunger in the crypt.

The history of his family’s wool of arms, which Montresor relates, is likewise a portent. The guard stresses the significance of a human foot crushing a stubborn serpent. The foot represents Montresor, while the snake represents Fortunato, in this illustration. Even though Fortunato’s biting abuses have hurt Montresor, Montresor will prevail in the end.

Read more: Easily Understand “Metaphysical Poetry” With Examples

Talk of Masons is another indication that Fortunato has passed away. When Fortunato challenges Montresor’s claim that he is a member of the Masonic order, Montresor responds with an insidious pun. By brandishing his shovel, he declares himself to be a “mason,” implying that he is a true stonemason who constructs things out of rocks and mortar, such as Fortunato’s tomb.

Montresor and Fortunato’s final exchange highlights the tragedy and suggests that Fortunato, strangely, has the better hand against Montresor in the end.

Fortunato’s “For the love of God, Montresor!” has sparked a lot of important debate. According to experts, Fortunato’s invocation of a God who has long since abandoned him demonstrates that Montresor has finally driven him to the depths of agony and despair. Some analysts argue that Montresor successfully lulled Fortunato to the crypts by using the same paradox that Fortunato later exploited to mock the “love of God.”

These are Fortunato’s final public addresses, and Montresor’s unexpectedly desperate reaction to them suggests that he misses Fortunato more than he would like to acknowledge.

The only time Montresor earns the right to have a weak heart is when he shrieks “Fortunato!” twice while humming, once with a negative clarification. Fortunato’s unwillingness to answer Montresor’s questions may represent some sort of bizarre win amid otherwise hopeless circumstances, though it’s not obvious what that victory is supposed to be.

Spread the love

3 thoughts on “Poe’s The Cask of Amontillado Summary and Analysis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *